RubiStar
  
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

>> To save this document onto your computer, please choose File :: Save As from your Browser Menu.


    Lab Report : Final Project


    Teacher Name: Dr. Kaiser


    Student Name:     ________________________________________

CATEGORY
4
3
2
1
Patient's history
The significance of the patient's history in making the final diagnosis was well explained. A good outside source was used and cited correctly. (Minus 1 point if cited incorrectly.)
The significance some of the patient's history in making the final diagnosis was well explained. A good outside source was used but was not cited correctly. (Minus 1 point if cited incorrectly.)
The significance of the patient's history in making the final diagnosis was not well explained or you do not yet know what your unknown is. An incorrect outside sources was used but correctly cited. (Minus 1 point if cited incorrectly.)
The significance of the patient's history in making the final diagnosis was somewhat explained. Outside sources were not used or were not cited correctly.
Patient's symptoms
The significance of the each of the patient's symptoms in making the final diagnosis was well explained. A good outside source was used and cited correctly. (Minus 1 point if cited incorrectly.)
The significance of the some of the patient's symptoms in making the final diagnosis was well explained. A good outside source was used but was not cited correctly. (Minus 1 point if cited incorrectly.)
The significance of the patient's symptoms in making the final diagnosis was well explained but you do not yet know what your unknown is. An incorrect outside sources was used but correctly cited. (Minus 1 point if cited incorrectly.)
The significance of the patient's symptoms in making the final diagnosis was somewhat explained. Outside sources were not used or were not cited correctly.
Vocabulary list
All important medical terms were defined.
Most important medical terms were defined.
Some important medical terms were defined.
Important medical terms were not defined.
Results of lab tests in the case study
The significance of the results of each of the lab tests given in the case study in making the final diagnosis was well explained.
The significance of the results of most of the lab tests given in the case study in making the final diagnosis was well explained.
The significance of some of the results of the lab tests given in the case study in making the final diagnosis was well explained.
The results of the lab tests given in the case study were stated but their significance in making the final diagnosis was not included.
Gram stain
The Gram reaction, shape, and arrangement of the bacterium are all correct and were used correctly in determining which media and/or tests to use next with an explanation as to why.
The Gram reaction, shape, and arrangement of the bacterium are all correct and were used correctly in determining which media and/or tests to use next but there is no explanation as to why.
The Gram reaction, shape, and arrangement of the bacterium are all correct but were not used in determining which media and/or tests to use.
The shape and the arrangement of the bacterium and/or the Gram reaction is incorrect.
Choice of isolation media
The choice of isolation medium or media is correct with an explanation as to why it was chosen.
The choice of isolation medium or media is correct with an explanation as to why it was chosen, but an additional medium or additional media should have been used.
The choice of isolation medium or media is correct with an explanation as to why it was chosen, but an additional medium or additional media not needed were used.
The choice of isolation medium or media is incorrect.
Choice of additional identification tests
The choice of additional identification tests is correct.
The choice of some additional identification tests is correct but additional identification tests should have been used.
The choice of some additional identification tests is correct but additional identification tests not needed were used
The choice of additional identification tests is incorrect.
Results of isolation media
The results of the isolation media are correct, their significance was stated, and there is an explanation of what additional tests must be performed next.
The results of the isolation media are correct but the significance of their results was not stated. There is an explanation of what additional tests must be performed next.
The results of the some of the isolation media are missing or incorrect.
The results of the isolation media were not used in making the final diagnosis.
Results of additional identification tests
The results of additional identification tests are correct and were used correctly (which possible organism or organisms it could be) in making the final diagnosis.
The results of additional identification tests are correct but the significance of their results (which possible organism or organisms it could be) was not stated.
The results of some of the additional identification tests are missing or incorrect.
The results of additional identification tests were not used in making the final diagnosis.
Explanation of why other isolation media and additional test were not used
Good explanation of why all of the other isolation media and additional tests were not used.
Good explanation of why most of the other isolation media and additional tests were not used.
Poor explanation of why all or most of the other isolation media and additional tests were not used.
No explanation of why all or most of the other isolation media and additional tests were not used.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
The antibiotic susceptibility testing was done correctly.
The antibiotic susceptibility testing was done correctly but gaps were left after streaking the plate.
The antibiotic susceptibility testing was done correctly but the wrong discs were used.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was not done.
Choice of antibiotics
The choice of antibiotics is correct.
The choice of antibiotics is partially correct. Double zones, colonies in the zones, and/or feathering was not taken into account.
The choice of antibiotics is incorrect. Zones of inhibition were incorrectly measured.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was not done.
Final diagnosis
The genus and species of the bacterium and the infection it is causing are all correct.
The genus of the bacterium and the infection it is causing are both correct but the species is incorrect.
The genus and species of the bacterium are both correct but the infection it is causing is incorrect.
The genus and species of the bacterium and the infection it is causing are all incorrect.

Date Created: July 31, 2012
Date Last Modified: May 18, 2017


Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC

To view information about the Privacy Policies and the Terms of Use, please go to the following web address:
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=TermsOfUse